By Kandeh Sesay
In 2018, Sierra Leoneans—both at home and abroad—voted for change, frustrated by years of corruption and mismanagement. This led to a historic transition of power from the All People’s Congress (APC) to the Sierra Leone People’s Party (SLPP), with Julius Maada Bio assuming the presidency. Once the head of state under the military-led National Provisional Ruling Council (NPRC), many believed that Bio’s years of experience, vision, and empathy would propel Sierra Leone toward progress. After waiting over two decades for the presidency, expectations were high for meaningful reforms under his leadership.
Some analysts argued that Bio, given his background, could have played an active role in governance during his years in waiting—perhaps serving in Parliament. However, he remained singularly focused on securing the presidency, a decision that raised both hope and skepticism.
Now, six years into his presidency, a growing number of Sierra Leoneans are questioning whether his leadership has been a historical mistake. The man who once criticized the APC for corruption and mismanagement is now facing similar allegations. His administration has been widely criticized for failing to tackle corruption, and many of the promises he made during his campaign remain unfulfilled.
Disillusionment continues to grow, as many feel that the president’s rhetoric no longer aligns with the reality on the ground. Citizens who once placed their trust in Bio are now asking whether his leadership has brought the progress they had hoped for. Many believe they have been excluded from the benefits of his presidency.
President Bio’s rise to power was built on promises of democratic change, good governance, and restoring Sierra Leone’s international reputation. However, under his watch, the country’s image has significantly deteriorated. Reports suggest that Sierra Leone has become a key transit hub for drug trafficking, with allegations that members of Bio’s family may be involved in illicit activities. International assessments confirm that drug trafficking and money laundering remain rampant, as Sierra Leone serves as a major transshipment point for narcotics moving from South America and Asia to Europe and the United States. Corruption continues to block access to essential services, including healthcare, education, and law enforcement. Meanwhile, the judicial system remains inefficient, burdened with a backlog of unresolved cases.
Critics argue that Bio has abandoned the ideals that once defined his political aspirations. His administration now embodies the same governance failures he once condemned, leading to accusations of political backsliding—an abandonment of principles in favor of power. Those closest to him, rather than holding him accountable, appear unwilling to confront the reality of his leadership.
As disillusionment deepens, Sierra Leoneans are left to wonder: Is there still hope for the change they once believed in, or has their trust in President Bio been misplaced?
